Measurement of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 offers transformed paradigms for clinical trials of treatments for Alzheimer’s disease
Introduction
The recent report characterising the utility of a
commercially available immunoassay of phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) in
plasma to detect Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology was greeted with widespread
enthusiasm (Ashton et al., 2024). The report itself, and much of the comment in
response to it, focused on its potential use in clinical diagnosis: augmenting
the ability to distinguish AD from other causes of dementia, to distinguish
early AD from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or to detect AD in its preclinical
stages. However, the full benefit of these functions would only be realised
once effective drugs to prevent AD progression became available. Here, I focus
on a much more immediate application, the way that p-tau217 testing allows for the
development of clinical trials which are dramatically cheaper, less demanding
and shorter than those which have to date been used to assess the efficacy of
proposed disease-modifying treatments for AD.
Key characteristics of the performance of the plasma immunoassay for p-tau217
In order to fully understand the impact which the plasma
immunoassay for p-tau217 might have on clinical trial design, it is helpful to
be aware of some key aspects of its performance in relation to other more
invasive measures of AD progression and to clinical manifestations of disease.
Previously, the optimum biomarkers measures to identify Aβ and tau features of AD
pathology consisted of invasive and/or demanding investigations requiring
positron emission tomography (PET) scans or CSF sampling (Hansson et al.,
2023). Levels of p-tau217 have been shown to identify individuals with MCI who
have features of Aβ
pathology and also to be good predictors for progression of MCI to AD
(Gonzalez-Ortiz et al., 2024; Janelidze et al., 2023; Mendes et al., 2024). In
the study of the commercially available assay, plasma p-tau217 had high
accuracy for identifying patients with elevated CSF Aβ and tau pathology, with area under the curve
(AUC) of 0.92 and 0.93 respectively (Ashton et al., 2024). Levels of plasma
p-tau217 increased across tau-PET–defined Braak
stages and increased over time in Aβ-positive
individuals, with the highest increase in those with tau positivity.
Overall, it seems that plasma p-tau217 levels agree very
well with other indicators of the pathological processes leading to clinical
AD. The levels do also discriminate between AD cases and controls and do also
predict clinical progress. Of course, even the best measures of pathology do
not correlate completely with clinical status. As discussed below, in the
context of early clinical trials for drugs targeting AD pathology, the ability
to assess the underlying pathology may be of key importance, ahead of effects
on clinical outcomes.
Possible advantages for use of plasma p-tau217 levels in clinical trials
A typical clinical trial for a possible treatment for
Alzheimer’s disease would involve both a CSF and/or PET assessment of pathology
and a clinical assessment of cognitive function. It would require a placebo
control group and sample sizes would need to be large enough to plausibly
provide adequate power, typically running into hundreds (van Dyck et al.,
2023). And it would need to take place over a period of time long enough for
there to be a reasonable expectation that a clinical effect might be observed,
for example 18 months, in order to demonstrate that the rate of deterioration
in cognitive function was lower in treated participants than in controls. All
these features mean that there are requirements for specialist expertise, a
research centre which can support the specialist investigations, substantial
resources and of course financial support for all of these. Here it is argued
that with some not unreasonable assumptions it might be possible to carry out
very small scale phase 2 trials which could be done at any clinical research
centre with no requirement for any specialist ability to carry out
investigations or even to perform cognitive testing.
No need for PET scanning or CSF sampling
This benefit is self-evident. If we accept that plasma
p-tau217 provides a reasonable indicator of underlying pathology with
performance on a par with PET or CSF based assessments, as seems reasonable,
then we can use it as our sole biomarker.
No need for clinical assessment
Again, if we accept that plasma p-tau217 is a marker of
disease activity then we can use it as the sole outcome measure and we do not
need to carry out detailed neuropsychological assessments for this purpose.
Furthermore, we do not even necessarily need to carry out any clinical
assessment in the process of recruitment. One might recruit volunteers from a
memory clinic who were already diagnosed with MCI or early AD. Alternatively,
one might simply advertise for volunteers aged 55-65, measure plasma p-tau217
in all of them and recruit the 10% or so who were found to have moderately
raised levels without carrying out any assessment of their cognitive function.
Thus in theory it might be feasible to carry out clinical trials in research
centres with no access to neuropsychiatric services. The research could be
delivered by anybody authorised to carry out drug trials.
No need for large cohorts or a protracted assessment period
A desirable property of plasma p-tau217, which does not
apply to clinical indicators of AD progress, is that the levels are dynamic and
might be expected to go down if a treatment effectively impacts the disease
process. By contrast, the expectation is that an effective treatment will not
restore cognitive function but will at best slow its decline. This implies that
one would need a large sample assessed over a prolonged period in order to
expect to see any difference in cognitive function between treatment and
placebo groups. By contrast, since measured plasma p-tau217 levels will reflect
a balance between production and elimination from the peripheral circulation, it
is not unreasonable to think that an effective treatment might produce a rapid,
perhaps immediate, decline in these levels. If one were in a position to assume
that levels do not usually decline spontaneously then a fall might be taken as
a promising indication of a treatment effect which could lead to more intensive
investigation. Again, in this situation it might be reasonable use only a
relatively small number of participants.
No need for a placebo group
If one is ready to make the assumption that p-tau217 levels
do not decline spontaneously then arguably there is no need for a placebo
group. One could simply administer a treatment to all participants to see if a
decrease occurred.
Suggested protocol
To summarise, a minimalist protocol to screen a number of
promising treatments which could be carried out at any clinical trials centre
might be as follows:
Advertise for volunteers aged between 55 and 65. Measure
plasma p-tau217 in 500. Select 50 subjects with the highest levels. Administer
the trial treatment for 3 months. Measure the levels again. If levels have
fallen then carry out further investigations of this treatment. Otherwise, move
on to trial the next treatment using the same cohort.
Such an approach would allow a quick screen for an effect on
AD progression of 8 different treatments in just 2 years.
Practical implications for trialling new treatments
Following the procedures outlined above, to a greater or
lesser extent, could dramatically reduce the requirements for a trial to
discover whether a proposed treatment seems to impact the AD process and hence
reduces the necessity to have substantial pre-existing evidence before
embarking on such a trial. To take a concrete example, we and others have
suggested that vanadium might impact AD progression (Curtis et al., 2019;
Curtis and Bandyopadhyay, 2021; Gonzalez-Cano et al., 2024; He et al., 2022;
Tavares et al., 2023; Yao et al., 2023). The rationale for this is based on
animal studies, genetic studies and an understanding of the effects of vanadate
on biological processes, in particular the insulin receptor activated pathway
which seems to inhibit tau phosphorylation. Admittedly, the evidence is not
overwhelming but it certainly seems sufficient to justify at least one trial to
see whether it does in fact have any impact on AD progression. However,
vanadate, at least in some forms, is readily available and sold as a dietary
supplement and could not be patented. Thus, a pharmaceutical company would have
no interest in sponsoring a trial of vanadate no matter how strong was the
preclinical evidence that it might be effective. And the huge sums of money which
to date have been required for AD clinical trials have meant that no
independent researcher has successfully applied to grant-giving bodies to carry
out such a trial.
The ability to use a marker in peripheral blood which can
cheaply and effectively provide an indicator of underlying AD process now
enables researchers to carry out initial phase 2 screening trials of vanadate
and perhaps dozens of other substances in a similar situation, for which there
is only modest preclinical evidence for an effect and/or which are not
attractive prospects for pharmaceutical companies. Hopefully, as the potential
benefits of this approach are recognised such trials will indeed start to take
place.
References
Ashton, N.J., Brum, W.S., Molfetta, G. Di, Benedet, A.L.,
Arslan, B., Jonaitis, E., Langhough, R.E., Cody, K., Wilson, R., Carlsson,
C.M., Vanmechelen, E., Montoliu-Gaya, L., Lantero-Rodriguez, J., Rahmouni, N.,
Tissot, C., Stevenson, J., Servaes, S., Therriault, J., Pascoal, T., Lleó, A.,
Alcolea, D., Fortea, J., Rosa-Neto, P., Johnson, S., Jeromin, A., Blennow, K.,
Zetterberg, H. (2024) Diagnostic Accuracy of a Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217
Immunoassay for Alzheimer Disease Pathology. JAMA Neurol 81, 255–263.
Curtis, D., Bakaya, K., Sharma, L., Bandyopadhay, S. (2019)
Weighted burden analysis of exome-sequenced late onset Alzheimer’s cases and
controls provides further evidence for involvement of PSEN1 and demonstrates
protective role for variants in tyrosine phosphatase genes. Ann Hum Genet 84,
291–302.
Curtis, D., Bandyopadhyay, S. (2021) Mini‐review:
Role of the PI3K/Akt pathway and tyrosine phosphatases in Alzheimer’s disease susceptibility. Ann Hum Genet 85, 1–6.
Gonzalez-Cano, S.I., Flores, G., Guevara, J.,
Morales-Medina, J.C., Treviño, S., Diaz, A. (2024) Polyoxidovanadates a new
therapeutic alternative for neurodegenerative and aging diseases. Neural Regen
Res 19, 571–577.
Gonzalez-Ortiz, F., Ferreira, P.C.L., González-Escalante,
A., Montoliu-Gaya, L., Ortiz-Romero, P., Kac, P.R., Turton, M., Kvartsberg, H.,
Ashton, N.J., Zetterberg, H., Harrison, P., Bellaver, B., Povala, G.,
Villemagne, V.L., Pascoal, T.A., Ganguli, M., Cohen, A.D., Minguillon, C.,
Contador, J., Suárez-Calvet, M., Karikari, T.K., Blennow, K. (2024) A novel
ultrasensitive assay for plasma p-tau217: Performance in individuals with
subjective cognitive decline and early Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 20,
1239–1249.
Hansson, O., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Dage, J. (2023)
Blood biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice and trials. Nat
Aging 3, 506–519.
He, Z., Zheng, L., Zhao, X., Li, X., Xue, H., Zhao, Q., Ren,
B., Li, N., Ni, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, Q. (2022) An Adequate Supply of
Bis(ethylmaltolato)oxidovanadium(IV) Remarkably Reversed the Pathological
Hallmarks of Alzheimer’s Disease in Triple-Transgenic Middle-Aged Mice. Biol
Trace Elem Res 200, 3248–3264.
Janelidze, S., Bali, D., Ashton, N.J., Barthelemy, N.R.,
Vanbrabant, J., Stoops, E., Vanmechelen, E., He, Y., Dolado, A.O.,
Triana-Baltzer, G., Pontecorvo, M.J., Zetterberg, H., Kolb, H., Vandijck, M.,
Blennow, K., Bateman, R.J., Hansson, O. (2023) Head-to-head comparison of 10
plasma phospho-tau assays in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 146,
1592–1601.
Mendes, A.J., Ribaldi, F., Lathuiliere, A., Ashton, N.J.,
Janelidze, S., Zetterberg, H., Scheffler, M., Assal, F., Garibotto, V.,
Blennow, K., Hansson, O., Frisoni, G.B. (2024) Head-to-head study of diagnostic
accuracy of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid p-tau217 versus p-tau181 and
p-tau231 in a memory clinic cohort. J Neurol 271.
Tavares, C.A., Santos, T.M.R., da Cunha, E.F.F., Ramalho,
T.C. (2023) Parameterization and validation of a new AMBER force field for an
oxovanadium (IV) complex with therapeutic potential implications in Alzheimer’s
disease. J Mol Graph Model 122.
van Dyck, C.H., Swanson, C.J., Aisen, P., Bateman, R.J.,
Chen, C., Gee, M., Kanekiyo, M., Li, D., Reyderman, L., Cohen, S., Froelich,
L., Katayama, S., Sabbagh, M., Vellas, B., Watson, D., Dhadda, S., Irizarry,
M., Kramer, L.D., Iwatsubo, T. (2023) Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease.
New England Journal of Medicine 388, 9–21.
Yao, J., He, Z., You, G., Liu, Q., Li, N. (2023) The
Deficits of Insulin Signal in Alzheimer’s Disease and the Mechanisms of
Vanadium Compounds in Curing AD. Curr Issues Mol Biol 45, 6365–6382.
Comments
Post a Comment