What a proper NHS manager looks like

People working in the NHS can be pretty cynical and bitter and I certainly have some major gripes about how I've been treated by management but in a spirit of fairness I think it's only right to post the email we got at the end of the year from our service director. It's practically a model for the kind of communication a manager should be sending to staff. It's about providing a high quality, compassionate and efficient service and you'll see buried in the middle there that they've been making economies in management and not in frontline services.

 So if you're working in the NHS and you didn't get a thank you email from your manager please feel free to show them this.

 Anyway, here is the email in full. It went round to everybody in the Tower Hamlets Adult Mental Health Directorate from the service director, Paul James.
Dear colleagues

Can I take this opportunity of thanking everyone who has worked for the Tower Hamlets Adult Directorate over the last year.

Despite the very difficult financial context and the huge pressures on our service we really have had a very good year witnessed by, amongst other things, :

·         The feedback our Community services received from the National Patient survey. The Trust was the highest performer in London and THs was the highest performer in the Trust – albeit we’ve got to do more to make service users aware of out of hours services!
·         Our In patient bed occupancy has been around 70% since March. This is a remarkable achievement given the well documented problems many other London Trusts are facing and is a tribute to the way in which the whole system – Home Treatment, EMHALs, the DSNs, the Community Teams, the DSNs, the Consultants, the Ward teams, Rehab and Resettlement, Housing Link, everyone – works together for the common good.
·         We have reduced the number of violent incidents on the Acute Wards by around 40% in the last year, again by everyone working together and tackling issues proactively when they occur.
·         We have managed a major capital project at THCFMH over the last year which has involved all of our Wards being relocated at some point   remarkably smoothly and with very little discernible impact on patient care or Andy Cruickshanks calm and unflustered persona!
·         Our number of Serious Incidents has, touch wood, been significantly lower than previous years and significantly lower also than for the other Adult Directorates.
·         Our number of disciplinary investigations remains low. Obviously on occasions we do have to resort to formal action but hopefully our staff understand we only do that when there has been no alternative and that we conduct such investigations and hearings as fairly, but firmly, as possible. But for the most part we want to  encourage staff to fulfil their potential by providing good quality, attentive supervision and support.
·         Despite the difficult financial situation we have managed our budgets very well . We have had to make difficult CRES (Cash Releasing Efficiency Savings) decisions. A number of our Managers now covering more than one area as we attempt to make economies on our management and overhead costs rather than front line services. I would especially like to thank all those staff who have had changes to their jobs due to such changes over the last year for their forbearance and professionalism.
·         And I could go on and on. We receive excellent feedback about the range of activities we provide on our Wards. The feedback about the quality of all our Psychological Treatment services remains good. The CQC visited have visited five of our six Wards with largely positive results. Our Commissioners think highly of us. We have excellent relations with our Local Authority partners,  etc etc etc.

We will continue to face financial difficulties over the next few years and further change is inevitable but we are in as good a position as we can possibly be to meet those challenges.   

One of the changes we will have is a new Clinical Director. I am sure we will appoint someone of very high calibre to that post. I know though that it will be impossible to find anyone who shows as much drive and commitment as Karl Marlowe, our outgoing CD. We have so much to thank Karl for and I am very pleased that he will continue to be part of our Directorate.

We have had a 53% response rate to the Staff Survey this year, our first year where we have had an above 50% turnout, which is brilliant. Thank you to everyone who participated. We will get the results in March and we will do our best to give you feedback and to respond to your concerns once we have done so.

Can I end by thanking everyone again for their kindness and compassion. Can I thank especially all your colleagues who are working over the Christmas and Bank Holidays, either on the Unit, at EMHALs, in HTT and AOS and on call. We are truly a 24/7 service and we owe our out of hours services an especial debt of gratitude.

Wishing everyone a very happy Christmas and New Year.

Best wishes


Paul

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nailing Hunt's lies

Here is the soundbite which Hunt has been repeating ad nauseam: "And at the moment we have an NHS where if you have a stroke at the weekends, you're 20% more likely to die. That can't be acceptable." Sounds quite impressive? I tweeted him to ask for evidence and got no reply so I decided to look for my own. It wasn't hard to find. I'll deal with the best and most recent example. The headline finding from this paper is that patients admitted at weekends with a stroke diagnosis have an increased 7-day mortality of 19%, apparently just as Hunt claims: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487251/ The 7-day mortality for week-end admissions is 12.9% and for week-day admissions is 11.1% and if you factor in comorbidities etc. this gives you an adjusted mortality odds ratio of 1.19. Just as Hunt says. But let's look more closely. At some numbers buried in the text of the paper and not even given a p value, even though they are probably the most st...
Read more

Sex and gender

This post is just here because I find myself having to make the same arguments again and again on twitter so in future I'm just going to link to this. Do I know what I'm talking about? I was a psychiatrist in the National Health Service for thirty years. That means I qualified as a medical doctor and then had post-graduate training, which naturally included some material on human development and sex and gender. I also have two doctoral degrees in human genetics, an MD and a PhD, and have been an author on hundreds of peer-reviewed papers, mostly on human genetics. Because of my research in genetics I am an Honorary Professor at two different London universities. My bio is here: http://www.davecurtis.net/dcurtis.html and the publications can be viewed here: https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?hl=en&user=Vrr4Ig0AAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate Do I do research in sexual development in humans? No. Do I understand it? Yes. I've read the stuff that ...
Read more

SITUATIONAL JUDGEMENT TEST - example ranking question

Example Ranking Question You are in charge of a large national organisation responsible for assessing the abilities of all the country's newly qualified doctors and matching them to appropriate employment. Shortly before distributing the results and final allocations you become aware that there is a problem with the marking system which you have outsourced. Rank in order the following actions in response to this situation (1= Most appropriate; 5= Least appropriate) A. Cross your fingers and hope it will all be OK. Probably nobody will mind too much. B.  Send out the incorrect marks and allocations then follow with an email saying you will get medical schools to check all the papers and have another go at it. C.  As above but attempt to shift some of the blame onto one of the candidates by implying that their smudgy pencil confused the marking machine so really it's all their fault. D.  Admit that things may not have been perfect but undertake to try to do better ...
Read more

How to be a dualist

How to be a dualist David Curtis UCL Genetics Institute, University College London Centre for Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London d.curtis@ucl.ac.uk   Is dualism really that bad? One of my reasons for writing this is that people seem to think it’s not OK to be a dualist. There’s this notion that dualism is somehow a thoroughly disreputable position. People go “Ah but that’s dualist” or say “Cartesian dualism” as a euphemism for “nonsense”. What I’m going to claim here is that dualism is in fact intellectually quite respectable and defensible, as long as you do it right. Maybe you still won’t tell other people that you’re a dualist but at least you might feel a bit better about yourself. Where to draw the line Saying “mind-body dualism” is risky because the word “mind” is often used to refer to mental activities such as thinking, judging and remembering. It’s perfectly obvious that these are activities of the brain and if we start trying to split them off f...
Read more

Why GWAS's are evil

OK, yes, I know that genome-wide association studies have identified some important genetic effects but there are some important downsides too. I truthfully do not know whether the benefits have outweighed the costs. Why am I saying this? (None of this is supposed to be original. Conversely, I am not going to go to the trouble to find the myriad of people who may have said the same thing first. So sue me. I think that's what blogs are for?) Here are some pertinent points: Nobody believes anything if it's not in a GWAS Studies which would previously have been judged to give perfectly respectable evidence to implicate a candidate gene are nowadays completely ignored because the stupid GWAS missed said gene. People don't believe a candidate gene study which yields a corrected p value of 0.001 derived from 20 markers but they do believe a GWAS which produces one p value of 10^-8. There is no logic in this position. But a lot of people take this attitude. At a recent confe...
Read more